As the full
dimension of the Trump victory became apparent, a veteran strategist remarked,
“My crystal ball has been shattered…Tonight data died.” After a sleepless night,
I struggled like many others to come to terms with the shocking turn of events.
How was it possible that someone so unqualified for the presidency could defeat
the most qualified candidate in decades?
Trump owes
much to the moral collapse of the Republican leadership who abandoned principles
for political expediency, and to the arrogance of Democrats who
took their base for granted and failed to reach beyond it. There should be serious
soul-searching among the media giants who profited hugely from Trump’s ascent.
He in turn received billions in free promotion through disproportionate coverage.
Media gave virtually no consideration to matters of policy. They grossly
underreported the underlying concerns of voters and relied heavily on polls and
punditry.
The biggest
take-away from the election is that much of America lives in parallel universes.
The mindset and daily realities of those on the east and west coasts are worlds
apart from those in America’s heartland. And while the thriving and increasingly
diverse major metropolitan regions across the country are largely Democratic strongholds,
the vast rural areas and numerous small towns, many of which face declining
economies and opportunities, are less diverse and strongly Republican.
Much has
been made of “working class” support for Trump. He won significant support in the
rust-belt where the effects of globalization are felt most keenly. But the
median income of Trump voters in the primaries was $72,000 while Clinton’s was
around $61,000. Issues related to culture, values and identity were greater
contributing factors. After all, if Trump was truly leading a working class
movement, why did an overwhelming majority of African Americans and two-thirds
of Latinos vote for Clinton?
Racial
anxiety, or, as a Pew Research Center survey found, concern that “the growing
number of newcomers from other countries threatens US values,” appear to be the
most common indicators of Trump support. White nationalism is a more accurate
description of the movement. From the outset of Obama’s presidency, the backlash
against the first black man to occupy the White House was vicious and sustained.
Put in the context of similar backlashes in Europe, what we may be seeing is
reaction to the end of 500 years of white colonial domination.
Our young
people are experiencing the deepest and most lasting wounds. The memory of this
brutal campaign will not be easily erased. A Muslim friend says that for months
before the election her children were reporting racial taunts from white kids
in affluent county suburbs. A Latino leader whose son attends a Jesuit school in affluent Silicon Valley told me that a boy came into class this week chanting, "Build that wall, deport them all!" Children who have grown up with Obama as a role model are confused and traumatized. Across the country thousands of
young people who feel betrayed have taken to the streets in protest.
Besides race,
Trump tapped into a deep-seated male chauvinism and misogyny. Had Clinton
behaved as crudely towards men as Trump did towards women she would not have
survived a day in the primaries let alone in the presidential campaign.
But despite all this, we must also recognize that many white Americans do feel genuinely bewildered,
lost and left behind in a rapidly changing world. Cultural, social and demographic changes as
well as economic stress cause anxiety and a crisis of identity. Middle-aged
white males are getting sicker and dying in greater numbers compared to every
other group.
Liberals,
particularly the college-educated elite, must share blame for the deep
polarization. As one commentator observed, they failed to foresee the political
shockwave and have virtually no understanding of the worldview of Trump supporters. Within the white community the gulf between so-called
“educated” and “working class” voters is as great as the racial divide. Charles Camosy writes in the Washington Post
about the “monolithic, insulated political culture” in most of our colleges and
universities.
Liberals have
often been guilty of bigotry against conservative religion and against rural
and poor whites. Conservatives are not wrong when they resist what they see as
a decline in moral values and family life and the crudeness of our
entertainment industry. Democrats have been reluctant to recognize that many
Christian evangelicals who may differ with secular liberals on issues such as
abortion could be strong allies on racial justice issues. America is a vast and
complex country and defies easy stereotyping.
Supporters
of Trump and of Bernie Sanders are rightly in revolt against the corruption of
Wall Street and Washington, DC. Above all, millions of Americans want their
voices to be heard. The election result was more a shout against the
establishment than a vote for Trump. Democrats and Republicans would do well to
listen carefully.
There is
much talk now of the need for “healing.” Clinton’s concession statement in
which she pledged to help Trump be a good president was a model of
graciousness. Democrats should follow her lead. Trump praised Clinton and says
he wants to be a president for all the people. After his attacks on Muslims and
immigrants he has work to do, and those Republican leaders who first denounced
and then supported him must hold the new president accountable.
Obama displayed
class and dignity by reminding America – and the world – that the peaceful
transfer of power by the ballot and not the bullet is a hallmark of this
nation. His remarkable welcome to Trump at the White House prompted the
president-elect to call him “a very good man” and to add that he would seek
Obama’s counsel.
Healing will not be easy. Clinton’s running
mate, Tim Kaine, could play a key bridgebuilding role in the Senate. He is
well-liked and trusted by members of both parties, and he combines a strong
faith with a passion for racial justice. As a representative of an increasingly
diverse southern state, he understands the importance of history and tradition as
well as the reality of changing demographics.
The
trustbuilding work of Initiatives of Change USA with its focus on race,
reconciliation and responsibility has never been more relevant. The core
principles of its manifesto issued in 1996 as a Call to Community could form a basis
for the healing that America so desperately needs. They include a commitment to
listening carefully and respectfully to one another and the whole community;
honoring each person, appealing to the best qualities and refusing to
stereotype; building lasting relationships outside our comfort zone; and
holding ourselves, our communities and institutions
accountable in areas where change is needed.
Initiatives
of Change is partnering with the W.K. Kellogg Foundation and more than 130
other organizations to develop a Truth, Racial Healing and Transformation
process for the United States. Perhaps the shock of the election will jolt
Americans enough to take a fresh look at our assumptions, prejudices and
insularity. We might take a break from social media and talk with our
neighbors. Perhaps we are more ready for honest conversation than we realize.
I've been thinking about IOC since Wednesday morning, November8. What a perfect opportunity to introduce more Americans to the principles and practice of trust building and honest conversation. Initiatives of Change and Hope in the Cities have been significant catalysts for mutual respect and understanding for decades. Thank you!
ReplyDeleteLavetta McCune
Lavetta.mccune@gmail.com